This page you are viewing is part of the SEVA Wiki Archive, Please visit the new Official Website!
NOTICE: Visit the Maillist page for help joining the new google groups email list, the old maillist is no more.
SEVA meetings are held every second Tuesday.


Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rjf/Spam"

From SeattleEVA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Bad Behavior extension)
 
(reply)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*I am using Bad Behavior on my wiki, but I have low traffic volume, and the Bad Behavior log doesn't show any spambot attempts.
 
*I am using Bad Behavior on my wiki, but I have low traffic volume, and the Bad Behavior log doesn't show any spambot attempts.
 
:--[[User:Jwalling|Jwalling]] 14:14, 15 January 2006 (CST)
 
:--[[User:Jwalling|Jwalling]] 14:14, 15 January 2006 (CST)
 +
 +
:: No, it's the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/SpamBlacklist_extension SpamBlacklist extension], all of our spam is tracked on the associated article, I've also had to locked certain pages. --[[User:Rjf|Rjf]] 03:01, 16 January 2006 (CST)

Latest revision as of 09:01, 16 January 2006

Bad Behavior

  • Do you have Bad Behavior extension installed? If so, what kinds of spambot posts get past it?
  • I am using Bad Behavior on my wiki, but I have low traffic volume, and the Bad Behavior log doesn't show any spambot attempts.
--Jwalling 14:14, 15 January 2006 (CST)
No, it's the SpamBlacklist extension, all of our spam is tracked on the associated article, I've also had to locked certain pages. --Rjf 03:01, 16 January 2006 (CST)