This page you are viewing is part of the SEVA Wiki Archive, Please visit the new Official Website!
NOTICE: Visit the Maillist page for help joining the new google groups email list, the old maillist is no more.
SEVA meetings are held every second Tuesday.


Difference between revisions of "Talk:EAA-PHEV PRIUS Documentation"

From SeattleEVA
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(discovering changes by felix)
 
(cleared.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
History.  I was the technical lead for CalCars 2004 PRIUS+ modification of
 
my 2004 Prius into a pluggable hybrid (PHEV).  Felix Kramer, CalCars
 
founder, enlisted me in mid-2004, shortly after I first contacted him.  The
 
project had a lot of internet collaboration as well as physical volunteer
 
help, largely from Electric Automobile Association (EAA) members (thanks to
 
everyone).  You can view much of the history of the project at
 
http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/priusplus/messages.
 
  
 
Greg Hanson offered EnergyCS help at low cost.  They had a CAN bus
 
controller that they turned into a battery management computer to replace
 
Toyotas Battery ECU by emulating that OEM computers CAN messages to the
 
rest of the hybrid system.  This system, though proprietary, got our PRIUS+
 
working quickly; first smoke-tested in late September, it was working well
 
by early November 2004.
 
 
Greg and others at EnergyCS then got excited, built their own Prius
 
conversion using Valence Li-ion batteries, and  with CleanTech, a company
 
to which Felix introduced them  started EDrive Systems to commercialize
 
Prius PHEV conversions.  This is an exciting development, which may provide,
 
for most people, the first opportunity to own a PHEV.
 
 
However, there is also a community of experimenters, schools, and others
 
interested in doing such modifications themselves, and the EnergyCS
 
controller is not available for this purpose.  Fortunately, Dan Kroushl
 
discovered and shared the information that a higher-voltage battery is
 
capable of fooling Toyotas Battery ECU into giving a higher SOC reading.  I
 
started experimenting with higher voltages of PbA batteries and came up with
 
an algorithm for fooling the Battery ECU in an organized way.  It has so far
 
been tried only with PbA batteries, and only with manual control, but I hope
 
and expect it to work more generally.  It will be described in detail below.
 
 
 
Battery pack.  I specified a BB Battery PbA battery pack (18 EVP20-12B1
 
modules from http://www.electricrider.com/batteries.htm) for our first
 
conversion attempt, in order to go through our learning curve with
 
inexpensive, fairly indestructible batteries.  This turned out to be an
 
excellent decision, as, though it required replacement after 200 cycles and
 
just under a year, this pack has sustained our PRIUS+ through over a year of
 
work on finding a more advanced battery pack.  The BB electric bicycle
 
batteries, though very marginal for this application, are actually quite
 
remarkable among PbA batteries.  When fully charged, these 20Ah (12Ah @ ½
 
hour rate) batteries have a lower internal resistance (~250 milliohms) than
 
the OEM battery (300-350 milliohms) and are capable of supplying the Priuss
 
maximum draw of 200A  a 10C or 17C rate, depending on which capacity you
 
calculate it against.  At low SOC, however, the internal resistance is >500
 
milliohms, too high for full hybrid functionality.  My PRIUS+s performance
 
has been documented in CalCars PRIUS+ Fact Sheet, available at
 
http://www.CalCars.org.  In short, the BB Batteries weigh about 260 lb and
 
provide for approximately double the normal Prius gasoline mileage for
 
around 20 miles of mixed (town and highway) driving on each charge.
 
 
Next, we planned on installing a NiMH pack, largely to prove that the
 
chemistry that is already in all of todays mass produced hybrids is also
 
capable of powering electrically and economically effective PHEVs; thereby
 
removing one more auto company excuse for not building them.  After that, we
 
would move on to Li-ion, which we expect to require additional engineering
 
work to ensure proper cell-by-cell charge and discharge control as well as
 
to engineer out any likelihood of thermal runaway problems, to which this
 
chemistry is prone.
 
 
 
I also looked at many Li-ion possibilities.  The least expensive option is
 
currently 18650 cells, produced in huge volumes for laptop computers.
 
However, these, like the sub-C NiMH cells, are very small (2-2.8Ah).  Also,
 
they are typically designed for 2-5 hour discharge rates and lack high power
 
capabilities.  One pays more for high power, low susceptibility to thermal
 
runaway, and long cycle life  and you still have to parallel many cells to
 
reach the necessary capacity.  A typical PRIUS+ pack would use at least 1200
 
cells, providing plenty of failure points.  While looking only at
 
technologies that are in production, if only in the early stages, CalCars
 
has begun discussions with more than one specialty Li-ion manufacturer with
 
lines of high-power-capable Li-ion cells.
 
 
CalCars and Electro Energy, Inc, in Danbury, Connecticut, are now in the
 
late stages of a joint project to adapt their unique form of NiMH packs to
 
the PRIUS+.  As part of the project, I have designed control circuitry that
 
is specific to the characteristics of this battery as well as Toyotas BMS.
 
When complete (expected yet this first quarter of 2006), the pack should
 
weigh about the same as the BB Battery pack but last for 40-50 miles of
 
mixed driving.  Internal resistance figures we have seen so far are in the
 
200 milliohms range.  It is possible that Electro Energy will elect to sell
 
this pack to experimenters, so stay tuned.
 

Latest revision as of 12:50, 22 January 2006