SeattleEVA Forums
February 07, 2012, 10:19:43 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
Our monthly meetings have changed location back to the Church of the Nazurene above the Mosaic Community Coffee House.
 
    SEVA wiki     RSS All   SEVA Forums Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: What vehicles are actually safer?  (Read 9147 times)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Paul
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 37



« Reply #461: August 01, 2008, 06:39:36 pm »

If you run 2 Suburbans head on into each other, each going 50 mph, the likely hood of death is much greater than if you run 2 Camrys head on into each other at 50 mph.

Paul, what brings you to this conclusion of a hypothetical situation? Why do you feel the likelihood of death is "much greater"? I understand the larger amount of kinetic energy involved, but I'm wondering what exactly brings you to this conclusion? The chart that you posted before gives us numbers, but what do those numbers mean? I agree that the Camry handling and braking numbers are slightly better, but in a Suburban - Camry accident, I still strongly disagree... I'd much rather be in the Suburban... and yes, I understand crumple zones, deceleration distances, etc.

You just answered the question. Crumple zones are stopping distance. Greater stopping distance lower the G forces on the occupants. The Suburbans will look a lot better after the accident (with that solid bumper bolted to a rigid frame.) Crumple zones and more strict safety requirements for passenger cars, compared to Trucks (including most SUVs), favor the drivers in the Camrys.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.6 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.062 seconds with 20 queries.